Mississauga 2026 Citizen Engagement

← Core Issues

Mississauga's climate targets after the provincial duty ended

confirmed  city-wide

The tension: Mississauga's climate plan commits the city to reducing emissions 40 per cent by 2030 and 80 per cent by 2050 against 1990 levels, and in June 2025 the City opened a public consultation on an update that would explore stronger, more ambitious targets more closely aligned with the IPCC's 1.5-degree recommendations. Five months later Ontario repealed its own statutory duty to set emissions targets at all, publish them, prepare a climate change plan, publish it, report on progress, or publish the reports — six mandatory duties, removed by the first schedule of a budget bill, in force on Royal Assent on 2025-11-27. Nothing in that repeal changes what Mississauga may do. What it removes is the published provincial reference point a municipality could measure a provincial decision against. Council received a deputation on the plan update's Engagement Update on 19 November 2025; the province carried second reading on the repeal five days later, third reading the day after that, and it was in force eight days after the Council meeting. The Act that created those duties in 2018 had three days of Standing Committee consideration, was reported as amended, and carried on a recorded division three months after First Reading; the schedule repealing them went to no committee at all; after three days of second-reading debate and a time-allocation motion, its second- and third-reading votes came on consecutive sitting days, 24 and 25 November 2025.

Mississauga's climate plan commits the city to cutting emissions 40 per cent by 2030 and 80 per cent by 2050, against 1990 levels. In June 2025 the City began consulting on an update that would explore stronger targets. No stronger target had been adopted as of June 2026.

In November 2025 Ontario repealed its own legal duty to set emissions targets, prepare a climate plan and report on progress, and to publish each of them. The repeal was one schedule of a budget bill, and it went to no committee.

Nothing in it changes what Mississauga may do. What it removes is the published provincial reference point a municipality could measure a provincial decision against. The questions below ask what Council should publish, on what schedule, and by what kind of vote.

Resolution Options

Ways this tension could be resolved. Each question below tests one of them.

Questions you can ask

To: allMississauga's climate commitments were adopted while the province was statutorily required to publish targets and a plan. That requirement no longer exists. Will you support Council publishing a report identifying which of the City's commitments assumed a provincial framework, and which now rest on the City alone?

Tests: Say which commitments rested on the province

Heard an answer to this?

To: mayoralThe repealed section 5 required the Minister to prepare progress reports on a regular basis. The City's own Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) says "The City will report annually on progress." Will you commit to holding Mississauga to that annual schedule for its own progress against its own targets, with a recorded Council vote required before that schedule is changed or missed?

Tests: Hold the City to its own reporting promise

Heard an answer to this?

To: allThe Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) update opened for consultation in June 2025 and had not set a target as of June 2026. Will you commit to a recorded Council vote on the updated targets rather than approval by staff report, and to naming the date by which that vote happens?

Tests: Set new targets by recorded vote

Heard an answer to this?

Candidates on record

13 candidates are on record on this issue. Every candidate in these races is searched the same way. Only candidates who have said something in public on this issue are named here, with a link to the source; the others are counted by race below. The full record for every candidate is on Candidates.

Mayor

  • Alvin Tedjo (campaign site) · Facebook · X · Instagram
    • reported on record: As Ward 2 councillor, at a meeting of the City's Environmental Action Committee reported by The Pointer on July 17, 2026, Tedjo said: "A few years ago, we passed a motion at council to get to net zero by 2050, I know those are no longer realistic targets". The Pointer says he was referring to a 2023 council motion directing staff to examine new interim 2030 targets aimed at reaching net zero. The report does not say what he would do about the targets, and it does not give the date of that meeting. [source]
  • Carolyn Parrish (campaign site) · Facebook · X · Instagram
    • reported on record: As mayor, at a council meeting reported by The Pointer on May 18, 2026, Parrish asked staff whether the City could still press builders for higher environmental standards after Ontario's Bill 98 limited municipal green development standards. She said the City had lowered development charges "about as low as we can handle", and added: "We're really at the mercy of the province on this." A position on the province overriding the City's green building standards; it does not address the City's emissions targets or its Climate Change Action Plan. [source]
  • Mike Matulewicz (campaign site) · Instagram
    • reported on record: His campaign platform, "Clean Air Mississauga", proposes monitoring air, water, soil and noise neighbourhood by neighbourhood, with the University of Toronto Mississauga and Sheridan College, and says: "A city with a major university, a college, and a $4.1 billion operating budget has no excuse for leaving neighbourhood-level environmental monitoring entirely to Queen's Park." A general environmental position on air quality; it does not address the City's emissions targets or its Climate Change Action Plan. [source]

11 other candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 1

  • Olivia Gannon (campaign site)
    • reported on record: In a campaign post of August 22, 2026, Gannon says "Mississauga has an opportunity to become one of Canada's greenest cities", through nature-based measures such as community gardens, native planting, tree planting and rain gardens, while preparing for climate change. This is a general statement; it names no target or plan, and does not say who should set or change the City's targets. [source]
  • Stephen Dasko (campaign site) · Facebook
    • reported on record: Dasko, the sitting Ward 1 councillor, pledges on his campaign site to champion environmental stewardship of the ward's waterways and the Lake Ontario waterfront and to build on stormwater management and conservation work, saying "our natural environment is not simply an amenity". This is a general statement; it names no target or plan, and does not say who should set or change the City's targets. [source]

Ward 2

  • Alex Ragozzino (campaign site) · Facebook · X · Instagram
    • reported on record: In the same Vote Compass answers, Ragozzino strongly agrees that Mississauga should do more on climate change, framed as green space, tree canopy and traffic-signal synchronization: "At the city level, environmental work comes down to smart infrastructure." This is a general statement; it names no target or plan, and does not say who should set or change the City's targets. [source]
  • Ross Kutisker-Jacobson (campaign site) · Instagram
    • reported on record: Under its advocacy and collaboration heading, Kutisker-Jacobson's campaign platform says he would "hold the provincial and federal governments to account with regards to pollution, the environment", especially industry, and push for better air-quality standards. This is a general statement about pollution and air quality; it names no emissions target or plan, and does not say who should set or change the City's targets. [source]
  • Sue Shanly (campaign site) · Facebook · X · Instagram
    • reported on record: Shanly's platform has a plank on climate resilience, environmental stewardship and public health, covering tree canopy, stormwater, climate-resilient building standards and a pledge to "Map Mississauga’s local groundwater resources to evaluate climate impacts". This is a general statement about adapting to climate change; it names no emissions target or plan, and does not say who should set or change the City's targets. [source]
  • Tom Ellard (campaign site) · Facebook · X · Instagram
    • reported on record: Ellard's platform has a clean-air plank pledging to "Hold provincial and federal governments accountable for their environmental responsibilities" and to hold industry to higher air-quality standards. Answering Modern Mississauga Media's questionnaire, which the outlet put to every candidate, he said "The pollution in our airshed must be addressed for our children’s future", and that the way to do it is to get other levels of government to the table with industrial emitters in Ward 2. This is a general statement about air quality; it names no emissions target or plan, and does not say who should set or change the City's targets. [source][source]

10 other candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 3

5 candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 4

4 candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 5

  • Rosemarie Sanchez Sanchez (campaign site) · Facebook · X · Instagram
    • reported on record: In the same questionnaire she lists environmental sustainability among five campaign priorities, pledging to "Increase our neighborhood tree canopy to improve air quality" and reduce industrial and traffic pollution. This is a general statement scoped to Ward 5; it names no emissions target or plan, and does not say who should set or change the City's targets. [source]

    Their own website could not be read by our tools, so anything they have said only there is not shown here.

9 other candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 6

6 candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 7

14 candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. 3 more were searched, but their own websites could not be read by our tools, so this is not a finding that they have said nothing. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 8

  • Rahul Mehta (campaign site) · Facebook · Instagram
    • reported on record: Mehta's campaign platform, under 'Accelerate Climate Action', proposes to "Pursue green building retrofits, district energy, and paved-surface reductions", funded by grants from other governments, partnerships and philanthropy, and to double the City's tree-planting targets. This is a general climate statement: it names no emissions target or plan update, and does not say who should set the City's targets. [source]

4 other candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 9

  • Anwar Knight (campaign site) · Facebook · X · Instagram
    • reported on record: In answer to a questionnaire Modern Mississauga Media put to every candidate (September 6, 2026), Knight lists among his priorities protecting parks, trails and natural spaces while "finding practical ways to strengthen climate resilience and expand community spaces". This is a general climate statement: it names no emissions target or plan update, and does not say who should set the City's targets. [source]

3 other candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 10

5 candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

Ward 11

  • Amin Nanji (campaign site) · X
    • reported on record: On his campaign site's questions page, Nanji marks "Strongly agree" that Mississauga should do more to combat climate change, and lists five measures: upgrading infrastructure for extreme rain and heat, adding green space, incentives for heat pumps and lower-emission vehicles, funding emission-reduction startups, and "Create a climate ready fund so we have the funds when needed." This is a general climate statement: it names no emissions target or plan update, and does not say who should set the City's targets. [source]

2 other candidates searched 2026-10-09: no public position found yet. Every candidate in this race →

The full story

The record behind the questions, with a source at each claim.

What Mississauga has committed to

The City’s Climate Change Action Plan, developed in 2019, has two goals, which the City’s progress-reporting page states as: reduce greenhouse gas emissions 40% by 2030 and 80% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels, and “increase the City’s resilience and capacity to withstand and respond to current and future climate events.” It carries 89 actions across five action pathways, and states a long-term goal of becoming a net zero community.

Council reached it by direction: on 19 June 2019 Council passed a motion declaring a climate emergency which, in the City’s own words, “directed staff to develop and bring forward a climate change action plan to Council for approval by the end of 2019.”

The plan is being updated, and the update is not finished. A City media advisory of 19 June 2025 invited residents into consultation over the summer, saying the update “will explore opportunities to strengthen the City’s approach … by setting stronger, more ambitious targets more closely aligned with the [IPCC’s] recommendations to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.”

The Council record tracks it. General Committee received a staff deputation on the update on 26 March 2025 (GC-0126-2025, from EAC-0006-2025); given first to the Environmental Action Committee on 4 March 2025, the presentation covered technical modelling and the policies and programs in “Business As Planned” and “Low-Carbon” scenarios, and gave an update on engagement. Council received the Engagement Update on 19 November 2025 (GC-0544-2025, from EAC-0027-2025). On 24 June 2026 Council received a staff presentation on “progress on the 2019 Climate Change Action Plan” (GC-0353-2026, from EAC-0014-2026).

Every one of those resolutions is “be received.” Receiving a deputation is not adopting a target. No stronger target had been adopted as of that meeting, the latest record this page holds. The adopted figures remain 40% and 80%.

Council received the Engagement Update on 19 November 2025, five days before Ontario carried second reading on the repeal, six days before third reading carried on a deferred division, and eight days before it came into force. The repealing schedule went to no committee; the Act that created the duties in 2018 had three days of Standing Committee consideration and was reported as amended.

What Ontario removed

The Cap and Trade Cancellation Act, 2018 carried six mandatory duties:

Schedule 1 of Bill 68 provides: “Sections 3 to 5 of the Cap and Trade Cancellation Act, 2018 are repealed.” It came into force on Royal Assent, 2025-11-27, enacted as Statutes of Ontario 2025, chapter 15.

What was removed is the obligation, not a target. A target can be missed and argued about. A duty to have one is what makes missing it a fact anyone can point at.

Why this is a Mississauga question

Not because the City can restore the duty — it cannot: provincial law is made by the Legislature alone. It is a municipal question because the City’s own plan names a provincial plan, the Made in Ontario Environment Plan (2018), in the policy framework it was written within, while the province is no longer required to have a climate change plan at all.

The questions above are therefore about municipal mechanisms only: what the City publishes, on what schedule, and by what kind of vote.

This page covers the plan’s emissions goal. The plan’s second goal, to increase the City’s resilience to climate events, and who decides how Mississauga adapts to flooding and extreme weather, have their own page. The two share one instrument, the Climate Change Action Plan, and ask different questions of it.

What this issue does not say

It does not say the province intended any effect on municipalities. It does not say emissions will rise. It does not say Mississauga has strengthened its targets — the City is consulting on whether to, and had not adopted a new figure as at the date of this entry.

Fact-check

confirmed This entry in the ledger →

ONTARIO REPEALED ITS STATUTORY DUTY TO SET AND PUBLISH CLIMATE TARGETS AND A PLAN, IN FORCE 2025-11-27, WHILE MISSISSAUGA WAS CONSULTING ON STRENGTHENING ITS OWN. Sections 3 to 5 of the Cap and Trade Cancellation Act, 2018 required the Government to establish greenhouse gas reduction targets (s.3(1)) and make them public (s.3(2)); the Minister to prepare a climate change plan (s.4(1)) and make it public (s.4(3)); and the Minister to prepare progress reports on a regular basis (s.5(1)). Schedule 1 of Bill 68, the Plan to Protect Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2025 (No. 2), repealed all three sections, in force on Royal Assent 2025-11-27, S.O. 2025 c.15. First Reading 2025-11-06; second reading time-allocated, carried on division 2025-11-24 and ordered for third reading the same day pursuant to an Order of the House; third reading debated 2025-11-24, the recorded division DEFERRED and carried 2025-11-25; NO COMMITTEE STAGE. Corrected 2026-09-05: this previously read 'second and third reading both 2025-11-24' and the issue page said the repealing schedule 'took second and third reading on the same day'. The status table on the source cited FOR THAT VERY FACT records the third-reading division deferred to the next sitting day. The compression is real and is now stated accurately. MISSISSAUGA'S ADOPTED TARGETS ARE 40% BY 2030 AND 80% BY 2050 AGAINST 1990 LEVELS, with a long-term goal of a net zero community and 89 actions in five pathways; Council directed the plan by motion on 2019-06-19 declaring a climate emergency, and the City announced consultation on 2025-06-19 on 'stronger, more ambitious targets more closely aligned with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's recommendations to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius'. THE UPDATE REMAINS UNRESOLVED AS TO TARGETS: General Committee received a staff deputation on it on 2025-03-26 (GC-0126-2025, from EAC-0006-2025; the presentation, given first to the Environmental Action Committee on 2025-03-04, covered technical modelling of 'Business As Planned' and 'Low-Carbon' scenarios and an update on engagement), and Council received the Engagement Update on 2025-11-19 (GC-0544-2025, from EAC-0027-2025). EVERY ONE OF THOSE RESOLUTIONS IS 'BE RECEIVED'. Council took that last step FIVE DAYS before Ontario's second reading on the repeal, SIX before its third, and EIGHT DAYS before it came into force. ⚠️ NOT ASSERTED: that Mississauga has ADOPTED a stronger target — it has not, as at this entry's date; that the province intended any municipal effect; any emissions outcome on either side; and any comparison of the two governments' performance.

Developments

Dated, sourced updates on this issue, from the Journal.

2026-06-02 · confirmed

On June 2, 2026 the City's Climate Policy Supervisor reported to Mississauga's Environmental Action Committee on progress under the 2019 Climate Change Action Plan, whose adopted targets are cuts of 40 per cent by 2030 and 80 per cent by 2050 against 1990 levels. The committee received the report; its members asked whether the 2030 targets are achievable and about green building standards becoming mandatory. As The Pointer reported, staff said emissions from the City's own operations had fallen about 1.5 per cent a year since the plan began, and those operations account for about one per cent of the city's total. The Pointer also reported that provincial legislation had made the City's 2024 Green Development Standards voluntary for developers.